The Lancet
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
✓ Free legal copy found
Published version, hosted by doi.org
This is the final version, as it appears in the journal.
Read it free at doi.org →Licence: CC BY
Other free copies
- University of Manchester (research.manchester.ac.uk)Published version · Web page
- Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya (hdl.handle.net)Published version · Web page
- LA Referencia (doi.org)Published version · Web page
- udca.elogim.comPublished version · Web page
- eprints.gla.ac.ukAccepted manuscript · PDF
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk)Accepted manuscript · PDF
- research.wur.nlAccepted manuscript · Web page
- University of the Coast (hdl.handle.net)Accepted manuscript · Web page
- Queensland University of Technology (eprints.qut.edu.au)Preprint · PDF
- Monash University (researchmgt.monash.edu)Preprint · PDF
- Ghent University (biblio.ugent.be)Preprint · PDF
- Auckland University of Technology (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · PDF
- University of Milano-Bicocca (boa.unimib.it)Preprint · PDF
- Robert Koch Institute (edoc.rki.de)Preprint · PDF
- California Digital Library (escholarship.org)Preprint · PDF
- Auckland University of Technology (openrepository.aut.ac.nz)Preprint · PDF
- LA Referencia (repositorio.ufmg.br)Preprint · PDF
- University of Sussex (sro.sussex.ac.uk)Preprint · PDF
- European Bioinformatics Institute (europepmc.org)Preprint · Web page
- National Institutes of Health (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)Preprint · Web page
- The University of Western Australia (research-repository.uwa.edu.au)Preprint · Web page
- ruj.uj.edu.plPreprint · Web page
- Jagiellonian University (ruj.uj.edu.pl)Preprint · Web page
- ruj.uj.edu.plPreprint · Web page
- ruj.uj.edu.plPreprint · Web page
- Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (pure.amc.nl)Preprint · Web page
- urn.kb.sePreprint · Web page
- Umeå University (urn.kb.se)Preprint · Web page
- americanae.aecid.esPreprint · Web page
- Istituto di Ematologia di Bologna (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- The University of Adelaide (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- LA Referencia (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- Utrecht University (dspace.library.uu.nl)Preprint · Web page
- Queen Margaret University (eresearch.qmu.ac.uk)Preprint · Web page
- hdl.handle.netPreprint · Web page
- Figshare (United Kingdom) (figshare.com)Preprint · Web page
- Figshare (United Kingdom) (figshare.com)Preprint · Web page
- Figshare (United Kingdom) (figshare.com)Preprint · Web page
- Figshare (United Kingdom) (figshare.com)Preprint · Web page
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- University of Thessaly (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- Western University (ir.lib.uwo.ca)Preprint · Web page
- hdl.handle.netPreprint · Web page
- The University of Melbourne (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- The University of Melbourne (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- King's College London (kclpure.kcl.ac.uk)Preprint · Web page
- Technical University of Munich (mediatum.ub.tum.de)Preprint · Web page
- University of Nottingham (nottingham-repository.worktribe.com)Preprint · Web page
- Hacettepe University (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- Australian National University (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- University of Liège (orbi.uliege.be)Preprint · Web page
- Bielefeld University (pub.uni-bielefeld.de)Preprint · Web page
- Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de)Preprint · Web page
- Asklepios Klinik St. Georg (resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de)Preprint · Web page
- scopus.comPreprint · Web page
- pure.au.dkPreprint · Web page
- University of Edinburgh (research.ed.ac.uk)Preprint · Web page
- University of Groningen (research.rug.nl)Preprint · Web page
- Queen Mary University of London (qmro.qmul.ac.uk)Preprint · Web page
- hdl.handle.netPreprint · Web page
- hdl.handle.netPreprint · Web page
- University of Auckland (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- University of Bari Aldo Moro (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- Imperial College London (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- Australian Defence Force Academy (hdl.handle.net)Preprint · Web page
- hdl.handle.netPreprint · Web page
- University of Cambridge (repository.cam.ac.uk)Preprint · Web page
- University of Groningen (research.rug.nl)Preprint · Web page
- doi.orgFree copy · Web page
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 comparative risk assessment (CRA) is a comprehensive approach to risk factor quantification that offers a useful tool for synthesising evidence on risks and risk-outcome associations. With each annual GBD study, we update the GBD CRA to incorporate improved methods, new risks and risk-outcome pairs, and new data on risk exposure levels and risk-outcome associations. METHODS: We used the CRA framework developed for previous iterations of GBD to estimate levels and trends in exposure, attributable deaths, and attributable disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), by age group, sex, year, and location for 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or groups of risks from 1990 to 2017. This study included 476 risk-outcome pairs that met the GBD study criteria for convincing or probable evidence of causation. We extracted relative risk and exposure estimates from 46 749 randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, household surveys, census data, satellite data, and other sources. We used statistical models to pool data, adjust for bias, and incorporate covariates. Using the counterfactual scenario of theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL), we estimated the portion of deaths and DALYs that could be attributed to a given risk. We explored the relationship between development and risk exposure by modelling the relationship between the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) and risk-weighted exposure prevalence and estimated expected levels of exposure and risk-attributable burden by SDI. Finally, we explored temporal changes in risk-attributable DALYs by decomposing those changes into six main component drivers of change as follows: (1) population growth; (2) changes in population age structures; (3) changes in exposure to environmental and occupational risks; (4) changes in exposure to behavioural risks; (5) changes in exposure to metabolic risks; and (6) changes due to all other factors, approximated as the risk-deleted death and DALY rates, where the risk-deleted rate is the rate that would be observed had we reduced the exposure levels to the TMREL for all risk factors included in GBD 2017. FINDINGS: In 2017, 34·1 million (95% uncertainty interval [UI] 33·3-35·0) deaths and 1·21 billion (1·14-1·28) DALYs were attributable to GBD risk factors. Globally, 61·0% (59·6-62·4) of deaths and 48·3% (46·3-50·2) of DALYs were attributed to the GBD 2017 risk factors. When ranked by risk-attributable DALYs, high systolic blood pressure (SBP) was the leading risk factor, accounting for 10·4 million (9·39-11·5) deaths and 218 million (198-237) DALYs, followed by smoking (7·10 million [6·83-7·37] deaths and 182 million [173-193] DALYs), high fasting plasma glucose (6·53 million [5·23-8·23] deaths and 171 million [144-201] DALYs), high body-mass index (BMI; 4·72 million [2·99-6·70] deaths and 148 million [98·6-202] DALYs), and short gestation for birthweight (1·43 million [1·36-1·51] deaths and 139 million [131-147] DALYs). In total, risk-attributable DALYs declined by 4·9% (3·3-6·5) between 2007 and 2017. In the absence of demographic changes (ie, population growth and ageing), changes in risk exposure and risk-deleted DALYs would have led to a 23·5% decline in DALYs during that period. Conversely, in the absence of changes in risk exposure and risk-deleted DALYs, demographic changes would have led to an 18·6% increase in DALYs during that period. The ratios of observed risk exposure levels to exposure levels expected based on SDI (O/E ratios) increased globally for unsafe drinking water and household air pollution between 1990 and 2017. This result suggests that development is occurring more rapidly than are changes in the underlying risk structure in a population. Conversely, nearly universal declines in O/E ratios for smoking and alcohol use indicate that, for a given SDI, exposure to these risks is declining. In 2017, the leading Lev…
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32225-6 · Publisher: Elsevier BV